Comments on: Pining For Tall and Skinny http://hugeasscity.com/2007/12/29/pining-for-tall-and-skinny/ > so much wonderful packaged in such a mess Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:02:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Andrew http://hugeasscity.com/2007/12/29/pining-for-tall-and-skinny/comment-page-1/#comment-101 Andrew Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:07:09 +0000 http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2007/12/29/pining-for-tall-and-skinny/#comment-101 Too bad the european tower has been scrapped, or at least delayed indefinitely. Too bad the european tower has been scrapped, or at least delayed indefinitely.

]]> By: So Un-Seattle | hugeasscity http://hugeasscity.com/2007/12/29/pining-for-tall-and-skinny/comment-page-1/#comment-100 So Un-Seattle | hugeasscity Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:50:16 +0000 http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2007/12/29/pining-for-tall-and-skinny/#comment-100 [...] Now we’re talking tall and skinny. The building in the rendering above, known as the Trophy Building, is Pb Elemental’s proposed design for a 440′ residential tower with a footprint of a mere ~2000 square feet. There will be only 19 residential units in the building, each unit occupying two full floors. [...] [...] Now we’re talking tall and skinny. The building in the rendering above, known as the Trophy Building, is Pb Elemental’s proposed design for a 440′ residential tower with a footprint of a mere ~2000 square feet. There will be only 19 residential units in the building, each unit occupying two full floors. [...]

]]> By: zilfondel http://hugeasscity.com/2007/12/29/pining-for-tall-and-skinny/comment-page-1/#comment-99 zilfondel Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:18:13 +0000 http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2007/12/29/pining-for-tall-and-skinny/#comment-99 Scissor stairs are allowed in PDX, FYI... Amended a few years ago to allow the development of South Waterfront. Scissor stairs are allowed in PDX, FYI…

Amended a few years ago to allow the development of South Waterfront.

]]> By: michael http://hugeasscity.com/2007/12/29/pining-for-tall-and-skinny/comment-page-1/#comment-98 michael Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:26:56 +0000 http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2007/12/29/pining-for-tall-and-skinny/#comment-98 I wonder: Are tall and skinny buildings more sustainable? Or do they require a proportationally higher amount of materials? kind of like the opposite of buying in bulk? Back to the Costco argument I suppose. Have you seen any analysis on this? I wonder: Are tall and skinny buildings more sustainable? Or do they require a proportationally higher amount of materials? kind of like the opposite of buying in bulk? Back to the Costco argument I suppose. Have you seen any analysis on this?

]]>