<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lazy and Uninspired</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/</link>
	<description>&#62; so much wonderful packaged in such a mess</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mortgage calculator amortization</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-503918</link>
		<dc:creator>mortgage calculator amortization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 07:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-503918</guid>
		<description>I’m not sure where you&#039;re getting your info, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for great information I was looking for this information for my mission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not sure where you&#8217;re getting your info, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for great information I was looking for this information for my mission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pointer Men's Basketball</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-370858</link>
		<dc:creator>Pointer Men's Basketball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-370858</guid>
		<description>Maybe you could make changes to the page name title    Lazy and Uninspired &#124; hugeasscity to  more better for your blog post you make. I loved the blog post yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you could make changes to the page name title    Lazy and Uninspired | hugeasscity to  more better for your blog post you make. I loved the blog post yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>I assume you&#039;re asking about the MFTE. The way it works, and this is rental I&#039;m referring to, 20% of the units are priced to be affordable to those making 80% of the area&#039;s median income (or 90% for two bedrooms). In exchange for maintaining this 20% &quot;affordable&quot; developers receive a property tax exemption for 12 years. I&#039;m not as familiar with the homeownership component of MFTE, but I believe it gives buyers that fall into slightly higher median income categories property tax exemptions for 8 years, allowing them to afford more (but, to your point, doesn&#039;t incent developers to lower prices). I think MFTE is better for rental. To the larger point, though, it&#039;s a small tool in what should be a larger toolbox to help provide affordable housing for both renters and homeowners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you&#8217;re asking about the MFTE. The way it works, and this is rental I&#8217;m referring to, 20% of the units are priced to be affordable to those making 80% of the area&#8217;s median income (or 90% for two bedrooms). In exchange for maintaining this 20% &#8220;affordable&#8221; developers receive a property tax exemption for 12 years. I&#8217;m not as familiar with the homeownership component of MFTE, but I believe it gives buyers that fall into slightly higher median income categories property tax exemptions for 8 years, allowing them to afford more (but, to your point, doesn&#8217;t incent developers to lower prices). I think MFTE is better for rental. To the larger point, though, it&#8217;s a small tool in what should be a larger toolbox to help provide affordable housing for both renters and homeowners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>Joshua, what are the developers doing that make these units &quot;affordable&quot;?  Selling them for less?  Unless they&#039;re smaller or lower quality than other units, this is just a windfall for the first buyers that show up - they certainly won&#039;t sell for under market value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua, what are the developers doing that make these units &#8220;affordable&#8221;?  Selling them for less?  Unless they&#8217;re smaller or lower quality than other units, this is just a windfall for the first buyers that show up &#8211; they certainly won&#8217;t sell for under market value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>And, Dan: love the picture, and the irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, Dan: love the picture, and the irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>Size is certainly a factor in affordable housing, but primarily for singles, or early couples. When you start raising a family, it becomes increasingly difficult to make that 500 sf condo work. And the downtown isn&#039;t built for families yet.

I agree with Wes - the best way to make affordable housing happen is to incentivize it. They just passed a new MFTE program aimed at doing that, but it&#039;s limited. There are two major things the city could do to facilitate this: create a &quot;fast track&quot; zoning system, ideally performance based, that prioritizes certain types of projects. Allowing a developer to shave off 3-6 months from the entitlement process saves a lot of money and helps certain types of projects pencil. Second, grant TIF authority to cities and enable a more empowered public development authority that has the access to federal and state funds to enable this type of thing to happen. Actually, this last one is a state task, but unfortunately we have a speaker who refuses to even look at TIF legislation. I think he has good intentions, but the reality is that if we want to empower cities to fully shape their future, Chopp&#039;s gotta go.

As an aside - I don&#039;t think anyone would argue that plastic bags are more important than housing. But waste is an issue, too, and passing that legislation is a good political step for a lot of reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Size is certainly a factor in affordable housing, but primarily for singles, or early couples. When you start raising a family, it becomes increasingly difficult to make that 500 sf condo work. And the downtown isn&#8217;t built for families yet.</p>
<p>I agree with Wes &#8211; the best way to make affordable housing happen is to incentivize it. They just passed a new MFTE program aimed at doing that, but it&#8217;s limited. There are two major things the city could do to facilitate this: create a &#8220;fast track&#8221; zoning system, ideally performance based, that prioritizes certain types of projects. Allowing a developer to shave off 3-6 months from the entitlement process saves a lot of money and helps certain types of projects pencil. Second, grant TIF authority to cities and enable a more empowered public development authority that has the access to federal and state funds to enable this type of thing to happen. Actually, this last one is a state task, but unfortunately we have a speaker who refuses to even look at TIF legislation. I think he has good intentions, but the reality is that if we want to empower cities to fully shape their future, Chopp&#8217;s gotta go.</p>
<p>As an aside &#8211; I don&#8217;t think anyone would argue that plastic bags are more important than housing. But waste is an issue, too, and passing that legislation is a good political step for a lot of reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wes</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>Amen Spencer and Matt.
Very true Spencer, all smaller housing are not created equal.  And unfortunately, developers have been way too keen on building condos starting at $500,000...starting?!?!  Good thing is, the luxury condo market has been overbuilt and the rental market is on the ups.  Housing markets are complex, and a good example is that I forgot another good way the City can influence housing prices: use incentives to keep all the follow-the-buck developers from mindlessly overbuilding the same market because it happens to be a good one at that moment.  We could have been offering incentives to build midrise rentals instead of another brix, metropolitan, [insert creative modern urban buiding name here].  Thank you for waking me from another one of my oversimplifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen Spencer and Matt.<br />
Very true Spencer, all smaller housing are not created equal.  And unfortunately, developers have been way too keen on building condos starting at $500,000&#8230;starting?!?!  Good thing is, the luxury condo market has been overbuilt and the rental market is on the ups.  Housing markets are complex, and a good example is that I forgot another good way the City can influence housing prices: use incentives to keep all the follow-the-buck developers from mindlessly overbuilding the same market because it happens to be a good one at that moment.  We could have been offering incentives to build midrise rentals instead of another brix, metropolitan, [insert creative modern urban buiding name here].  Thank you for waking me from another one of my oversimplifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan bertolet</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>dan bertolet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Are none of you going to comment on the Spirit of 76 Dodge Dart?  Nothing about the irony of the all-American, bicentennial edition, red, white, and blue slant-6 classic in front of the red, white, and blue gas station selling gas at $4/gallon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are none of you going to comment on the Spirit of 76 Dodge Dart?  Nothing about the irony of the all-American, bicentennial edition, red, white, and blue slant-6 classic in front of the red, white, and blue gas station selling gas at $4/gallon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>Oops, I missed the third variable: number of stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I missed the third variable: number of stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/08/03/lazy-and-uninspired/#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>//Smaller housing is one type of solution but I’m not convinced it is affordable.//

Given a fixed location, you have exactly 2 variables to work with in order to change a location&#039;s affordability: size and cost of construction.  There have been good debates about how to affect the cost of construction, but the size variable is one that people seem to have a hard time with.

Why is size a big deal?  Because if you have the choice of building a house or 10 condos on the same lot, the land value of the condos will each be 1/10 of that of the house.  You just can&#039;t get that kind of value out of cutting corners on construction cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>//Smaller housing is one type of solution but I’m not convinced it is affordable.//</p>
<p>Given a fixed location, you have exactly 2 variables to work with in order to change a location&#8217;s affordability: size and cost of construction.  There have been good debates about how to affect the cost of construction, but the size variable is one that people seem to have a hard time with.</p>
<p>Why is size a big deal?  Because if you have the choice of building a house or 10 condos on the same lot, the land value of the condos will each be 1/10 of that of the house.  You just can&#8217;t get that kind of value out of cutting corners on construction cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

