<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Questions About The Seattle Public Schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/</link>
	<description>&#62; so much wonderful packaged in such a mess</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tami Bertot</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-512823</link>
		<dc:creator>Tami Bertot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 05:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-512823</guid>
		<description>We can&#039;t comprehend how much snowfall has dropped since last evening.  My 9 year old taking his very first trip for snow country during this winter season. He&#039;s getting his money&#039;s worth. The snowfall around the backyard is certainly much deeper than he is without a doubt tall in height, so he&#039;ll really enjoy it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can&#8217;t comprehend how much snowfall has dropped since last evening.  My 9 year old taking his very first trip for snow country during this winter season. He&#8217;s getting his money&#8217;s worth. The snowfall around the backyard is certainly much deeper than he is without a doubt tall in height, so he&#8217;ll really enjoy it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth About Density Advocates &#124; hugeasscity</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-2107</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth About Density Advocates &#124; hugeasscity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-2107</guid>
		<description>[...] care about our property values. We have kids in the Seattle Public School system and care about the quality of their education. We live around the corner from this shite and think the city owes residents and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] care about our property values. We have kids in the Seattle Public School system and care about the quality of their education. We live around the corner from this shite and think the city owes residents and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>John of Humdinger writes: &quot;Seattle Public Schools spends approx $9400 per student (plus a good bit of other stuff “off budget”.)
There are 23 private schools that charge far less than that, many less than half.&quot;

I just looked at the Seattle Times School Guide, and could not find a single non-religious school that was charging anything like that little. $10,000 is a rock-bottom price in the secular school market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John of Humdinger writes: &#8220;Seattle Public Schools spends approx $9400 per student (plus a good bit of other stuff “off budget”.)<br />
There are 23 private schools that charge far less than that, many less than half.&#8221;</p>
<p>I just looked at the Seattle Times School Guide, and could not find a single non-religious school that was charging anything like that little. $10,000 is a rock-bottom price in the secular school market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>require all teachers to meet higher performance criteria - those that don&#039;t get axed, those that do get raises. pay them well! talented teachers and administrators are what is needed in all situations, especially where parental involvement is not high. while controversial in her approach, Michelle Rhee has focused on attracting talent to the Washington DC school system. She has also been all about trimming the fat. The Mayor of DC effectively transferred all power from the school board to the Chancellor of Education position that Rhee now fills...school boards, in general have proven themselves to be an outdated, inefficient, and ineffective approach to making the decisions that are critical to moving our education system forward - on average, the U.S. spends more money per pupil than any other industrialized nation!!! where is all that money going?
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1862444-1,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>require all teachers to meet higher performance criteria &#8211; those that don&#8217;t get axed, those that do get raises. pay them well! talented teachers and administrators are what is needed in all situations, especially where parental involvement is not high. while controversial in her approach, Michelle Rhee has focused on attracting talent to the Washington DC school system. She has also been all about trimming the fat. The Mayor of DC effectively transferred all power from the school board to the Chancellor of Education position that Rhee now fills&#8230;school boards, in general have proven themselves to be an outdated, inefficient, and ineffective approach to making the decisions that are critical to moving our education system forward &#8211; on average, the U.S. spends more money per pupil than any other industrialized nation!!! where is all that money going?<br />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1862444-1,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1862444-1,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Staley</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Staley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>I largely agree with Matt, with the exception of indicators of quality parents. I had an old roommate for several years who was a teacher in a decent District in Sacramento. You could always tell when parent-teacher conferences were happening - he was tired, down, and didn&#039;t say much. His favorite phrase during these times was: &#039;the apple doesn&#039;t fall far from the tree&#039;. Meaning: nice house doesn&#039;t mean quality parenting. Our school here has wonderful teachers and an award-winning principal, but the parents...whew. When I go in the afternoons I try to calculate the %age of cars sitting there, idling. Always high. And the number of fat brats getting their *sses hauled home instead of walking...astronomical. And this is a &#039;nice&#039; neighborhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I largely agree with Matt, with the exception of indicators of quality parents. I had an old roommate for several years who was a teacher in a decent District in Sacramento. You could always tell when parent-teacher conferences were happening &#8211; he was tired, down, and didn&#8217;t say much. His favorite phrase during these times was: &#8216;the apple doesn&#8217;t fall far from the tree&#8217;. Meaning: nice house doesn&#8217;t mean quality parenting. Our school here has wonderful teachers and an award-winning principal, but the parents&#8230;whew. When I go in the afternoons I try to calculate the %age of cars sitting there, idling. Always high. And the number of fat brats getting their *sses hauled home instead of walking&#8230;astronomical. And this is a &#8216;nice&#8217; neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, my niece told me last week that two of her classmates are pregnant in her suburban junior high school.  Do we have any real data that Seattle schools are worse than those out in the suburbs?  (not that I&#039;d be surprised either way, I just haven&#039;t seen it)

I think both the discussion about unions and free market go to finance, not quality.  If the problem&#039;s really that we don&#039;t pump enough money into education, then that&#039;s a simple one to solve.

The discussion about parental responsibility seems irrelevant, unless we feel that Seattle is disproportionately filled with slacker parents (I&#039;ve observed the opposite).

I completely agree about having a downtown school.  Perhaps in the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/17/new-look-pioneer-square-station/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Civic Square&lt;/a&gt;?

I&#039;m not sure what makes a good school, but I&#039;ve seen excellent schools right next to terrible schools.  Maybe it&#039;s money, in this case the good school is given huge amounts of donations from parents, but I&#039;m sure there are other factors.  Being a good school almost seems to be self-reinforcing - good schools draw good teachers, encourage teachers and students, and bring in more donations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, my niece told me last week that two of her classmates are pregnant in her suburban junior high school.  Do we have any real data that Seattle schools are worse than those out in the suburbs?  (not that I&#8217;d be surprised either way, I just haven&#8217;t seen it)</p>
<p>I think both the discussion about unions and free market go to finance, not quality.  If the problem&#8217;s really that we don&#8217;t pump enough money into education, then that&#8217;s a simple one to solve.</p>
<p>The discussion about parental responsibility seems irrelevant, unless we feel that Seattle is disproportionately filled with slacker parents (I&#8217;ve observed the opposite).</p>
<p>I completely agree about having a downtown school.  Perhaps in the new <a href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/17/new-look-pioneer-square-station/" rel="nofollow">Civic Square</a>?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what makes a good school, but I&#8217;ve seen excellent schools right next to terrible schools.  Maybe it&#8217;s money, in this case the good school is given huge amounts of donations from parents, but I&#8217;m sure there are other factors.  Being a good school almost seems to be self-reinforcing &#8211; good schools draw good teachers, encourage teachers and students, and bring in more donations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan bertolet</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-2094</link>
		<dc:creator>dan bertolet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-2094</guid>
		<description>OK JOH, regarding public vs. private:

1.  To state the obvious, public schools get all the kids who can&#039;t afford private schools, and on average these kids will be harder to teach than those who can afford private schools.  It&#039;s determined by the family environment they&#039;ve grown up in, not IQ.

2.  I would assume that in many cases tuition costs at private schools are reduced by endowments and perhaps other sources of funding besides tuition.  You&#039;d need to get the private school total budget to compare to the public school expenditures.

3.  The answer to your question about parochial schools is not:  &quot;because they are driven by the profit motive.&quot;  And to me, this gets at the heart of it.  The free market is not a panacea for education, and is likely to do more harm than good.  This is because the free market requires a product that can be quantitatively assessed, and the well-rounded education of a child is not such a product.

Parochial schools succeed because they tend to be small, tightly knit communities with strongly held common values, and their desire to educate is rooted in moral obligation, not the profit motive.

And this points to the overarching answer to all my questions in the original post:  our public schools are failing because our culture is failing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK JOH, regarding public vs. private:</p>
<p>1.  To state the obvious, public schools get all the kids who can&#8217;t afford private schools, and on average these kids will be harder to teach than those who can afford private schools.  It&#8217;s determined by the family environment they&#8217;ve grown up in, not IQ.</p>
<p>2.  I would assume that in many cases tuition costs at private schools are reduced by endowments and perhaps other sources of funding besides tuition.  You&#8217;d need to get the private school total budget to compare to the public school expenditures.</p>
<p>3.  The answer to your question about parochial schools is not:  &#8220;because they are driven by the profit motive.&#8221;  And to me, this gets at the heart of it.  The free market is not a panacea for education, and is likely to do more harm than good.  This is because the free market requires a product that can be quantitatively assessed, and the well-rounded education of a child is not such a product.</p>
<p>Parochial schools succeed because they tend to be small, tightly knit communities with strongly held common values, and their desire to educate is rooted in moral obligation, not the profit motive.</p>
<p>And this points to the overarching answer to all my questions in the original post:  our public schools are failing because our culture is failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>it was explained to me that part of the problem stems for financial disparity between schools. some neighborhoods have extremely wealthy tax base and some don&#039;t, and as it&#039;s not divied up fairly, certain schools suffer greatly.

having attended public schools in belgium and germany before my parents moved back to the states, i was shocked at how dumb my american classmates were.

but i&#039;d chalk it up to mostly negligence, teacher unions that are never held to account but keep getting more and more for less and less, and some good ol&#039; fashioned embezzling.

strangely, the same problems that plague SPD. who&#039;da thunk it?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was explained to me that part of the problem stems for financial disparity between schools. some neighborhoods have extremely wealthy tax base and some don&#8217;t, and as it&#8217;s not divied up fairly, certain schools suffer greatly.</p>
<p>having attended public schools in belgium and germany before my parents moved back to the states, i was shocked at how dumb my american classmates were.</p>
<p>but i&#8217;d chalk it up to mostly negligence, teacher unions that are never held to account but keep getting more and more for less and less, and some good ol&#8217; fashioned embezzling.</p>
<p>strangely, the same problems that plague SPD. who&#8217;da thunk it?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John of Humdinger</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-2102</link>
		<dc:creator>John of Humdinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-2102</guid>
		<description>Josh:
Do a little research at the Seattle Times School Guide.
Seattle Public Schools spends approx $9400 per student (plus a good bit of other stuff &quot;off budget&quot;.)
There are 23 private schools that charge far less than that, many less than half. How can it be that for several decades parochial schools have been spending much less than public schools, but turning out a far superior product?
It&#039;s all because of special ed?
It&#039;s all Bush&#039;s fault?

Unless you see something I can&#039;t see, I don&#039;t see where I said teachers don&#039;t deserve good pay (in my comments above.) Let me try to explain to you what I did say: When everyone in an organization receives the same raise regardless of their performance the result is mediocrity and frustration... two epithets  which seem to be applied frequently to the Seattle Public Schools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh:<br />
Do a little research at the Seattle Times School Guide.<br />
Seattle Public Schools spends approx $9400 per student (plus a good bit of other stuff &#8220;off budget&#8221;.)<br />
There are 23 private schools that charge far less than that, many less than half. How can it be that for several decades parochial schools have been spending much less than public schools, but turning out a far superior product?<br />
It&#8217;s all because of special ed?<br />
It&#8217;s all Bush&#8217;s fault?</p>
<p>Unless you see something I can&#8217;t see, I don&#8217;t see where I said teachers don&#8217;t deserve good pay (in my comments above.) Let me try to explain to you what I did say: When everyone in an organization receives the same raise regardless of their performance the result is mediocrity and frustration&#8230; two epithets  which seem to be applied frequently to the Seattle Public Schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW</title>
		<link>http://hugeasscity.com/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>GW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisetank.com/hugeasscity/2008/11/26/a-few-questions-about-the-seattle-public-schools/#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>The answer is simple, really: Pournelle&#039;s Iron Law of Bureaucracy.  From the author: &quot;...in any bureaucratic organization there will be two kinds of people: those who work to further the actual goals of the organization, and those who work for the organization itself. Examples in education would be teachers who work and sacrifice to teach children, vs. union representative who work to protect any teacher including the most incompetent. The Iron Law states that in all cases, the second type of person will always gain control of the organization, and will always write the rules under which the organization functions.&quot;

As a parent with children in both public and private schools, I&#039;ve seen this in action so many times it&#039;s not remarkable enough to comment on any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is simple, really: Pournelle&#8217;s Iron Law of Bureaucracy.  From the author: &#8220;&#8230;in any bureaucratic organization there will be two kinds of people: those who work to further the actual goals of the organization, and those who work for the organization itself. Examples in education would be teachers who work and sacrifice to teach children, vs. union representative who work to protect any teacher including the most incompetent. The Iron Law states that in all cases, the second type of person will always gain control of the organization, and will always write the rules under which the organization functions.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a parent with children in both public and private schools, I&#8217;ve seen this in action so many times it&#8217;s not remarkable enough to comment on any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

