Comments on: Obamasscity

By: Full lace wigs

Full lace wigs — Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:56:39 +0000

Last time i visited this website there was very scarse comments. i see things have moved along nicely for you.

By: justin

justin — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:59:34 +0000

you know the usual hehe. anyways i enjoyed your blog, bookmarked! Achat Chaussures Gucci pas cher Gucci Mocassins Femme Gucci baskets Gucci Bottes Homme

By: Kendra Wilkinson video

Kendra Wilkinson video — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:46:17 +0000

honestly i love reading, laughing, chilling… you know the usual hehe. anyways i enjoyed your blog, bookmarked!

By: Dominic

Dominic — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:07:26 +0000

miss new york naked sexy pictures of cassie the singer nguoi viet online girls hairstyle photo meijers food store wal mart 500ml to gallons websites similar to megarotic asme y14 100ò 2004 practices pdf crank dat soija boi beat photos of micro braids printable hockey score sheets superhead and mr marcus video lisa lopez autopsy pictures us military sniper rifles for sale bridget marquardt playboy pics omorashi patience torrent safeway wedding cakes california cca credit catalog shopping club angelica theatres plano tx preteen models bbs lola

By: Spencer

Spencer — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:51:57 +0000

Dan and Matt,

I think you are getting toward the solution I am thinking about…but rail is not as much in the equation.

We need a solution that looks locally for it’s products. As you both are pointing out; we can not exist for much longer on the current way we do things. Shortening the distance our goods and services need to be consumed will lessen first our use of solid fuels and our reliance on other market forces. It will come with limits to variation of goods and services available to us but will open up the uniqueness and novelty of goods and services available as we travel to other places.

Spencer.

By: dan bertolet

dan bertolet — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:26:53 +0000

Like MTE said, rail. And the question we have to ask ourselves is, do we even have the resources, in the sunset of the oil age, to keep fixing the highways until a comprehensive rail system is in place, and also pay for that new rail system? It may be that we’ll have to choose one or the other, and in the long run we’d be better off letting the freeways crumble. Of course that would mean asking people to exchange short term pain for long term gain, and that goes against human nature.

By: Matt the Engineer

Matt the Engineer — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:14:07 +0000

Trucking is a terrible idea. Let’s drag goods around the country in big non-aerodynamic boxes on rubber wheels pulled by inefficient diesel-burning engines. Trucks can be used for local deliveries, if at all.

It’s a complete failure of our system that we drive the things across the country, when dozens (hundreds?) of the things can be trained together on tracks, operated by only a few people and a single efficient engine (diesel electrics are hybrids). Maybe even some day an electric motor, as is used in most of the world.

In Shanghai there’s a wonderful giant supermarket called the Metro, that lives at the end of the metro line. There’s probably a train line there too.

By: joshuadf

joshuadf — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:37:37 +0000

Deliveries without interstates and highways would work just fine, the same way they do in most of the world.

By: Josh Mahar

Josh Mahar — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:32:49 +0000

@4: Easy Dan, we use the wonderful power of people and just have big old central markets where everyone picks up their goods and walks/bikes/wagons them home.

By: Dan Staley

Dan Staley — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:30:55 +0000

Trucks just go away, Matt? How will rail deliver food to grocery stores?