Comments on: Location Location Location

By: motorola xoom

motorola xoom — Sat, 29 Jan 2011 06:43:04 +0000

I am linking this webpage from my private blog . this has all of the usefull data necessary.

By: Terry Devilliers

Terry Devilliers — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:12:05 +0000

Thanks for this review. Was doing a Google search and happened apon this blog. I liked it a lot that I bookmarked the idea. Additionally, I will be re-occurring for more so make sure to keep posting! – When I hear a man preach, I like to see him act as if he were fighting bees. Abraham Lincoln 1809 1865

By: Time Passages (They Grow Up So Fast) | hugeasscity

Time Passages (They Grow Up So Fast) | hugeasscity — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:29:05 +0000

[...] 4.7.09: 8th and Olive [...]

By: Rob A

Rob A — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 07:03:42 +0000

And, it doesn’t quite work the way you think it does Dan.

By: Rob A

Rob A — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 07:02:56 +0000

Looks fine to me. I agree it looks like NYC style density – love it!

By: dan bertolet

dan bertolet — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:46:06 +0000

Damn the torpedoes, I appear to be accused of objecting to density! Never!!!!!!!!

All I was pointing out is that it sure seems like a pretty dumb choice for a site, assuming there were other choices, which I am, in fact, assuming, given that there are so many old lowrise buildings and parking lots in the area.

By: Spencer

Spencer — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:11:04 +0000

David, those pictures made my neck sore.

I’m with Joe. Sometimes density has to mean building close to another building.

By: Joe G

Joe G — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:44:00 +0000

I think that this is perfectly fine. As all of us know Seattle seriously needs density. Look at cities like New York, these situations pop up all the time. It is something that we are all going to have to get used to. Buildings are going to get closer together and thats the way it is. I think the cities plan for density such as this in the core is a good one and that it would make a lot less sense to see this sort of building in outer parts of the city.

By: David

David — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:31 +0000

seen from the west, you can tell there is actually not THAT much overlap between the two buildings. It does look pretty bad from this angle, but in this pic (below) you can see that most of the building face is not directly facing the Quest Building.

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=449693&page=31

see third pic down in #604

By: Matt the Engineer

Matt the Engineer — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:38:04 +0000

Heh. I was trying to be sarcastic. I do think you have a point, but only if you combined it with Sabina’s.