If its so safe, you’ll agree, then, to be part of the ‘neighborhood trial’ that seeks to store spent nuke fuel under children’s beds. We can get under the standard trundle bed (not the “Cars” design, but most Disney beds) three 25-gal drums.

How many do we sign you up for?

Let us know and I’ll work on shipment as soon as the Interstate Commerce rules are clarified.

It would be better if people would post working links.

Actually, building them far enough to not be a direct threat but no further could be a huge benefit. Just dump waste heat into supply water and we’d all have pre-heated hot water and even free heat for heat pumps in the winter. From an engineering perspective nuclear is a beautiful solution. It’s just the real world that gets in the way (fear, money, prior accidents, politics, value engineering).

I’d actually heard of the micro-nuclear thing a few years ago at the conceptual stage. But maybe it was just at a lower level of hoax back then.

Besides, don’t you people have to clean up Hanford, and make sense out of that ticking, enormo, unattended-to superdoopermess, before you can even BEGIN to even OVERHEAR about how OTHER people now are mis-hallucinating new, carbon-friendly ‘nucular energy stations’ — especially as some kind of recklessly uncanny ‘alternative temples’ in this ‘Alt.energy’/Peak Oil/End-Times Paradigm-store “Scarcity Religion” you all are so busy feverishly engineering?

“Timmy, finish the rest of the ultratoxic cake you have on your 20th Century dessert plate; if you want more after that, in four billion years or so, THEN you can have more.”

I would have to vote no on nuclear power stations of any size being constructed at all, even on side streets in ‘Second Life’, let alone on Capital Hill or in neighboring municipalities; or indeed anywhere else wheresoever wherein organic beings (of any kind) still currently find themselves, kindasorta, still, you know,’living’.

(Just my .02 cents’ worth.)

Namaste!